On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:11:06PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 06:31:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > I think we can condense the older platforms down a lot, maybe even just > > GEN2, GEN3, GEN4. Or at least group desktop and mobile together, i.e. > > > > I8XX, I915, I945, G33/PNV, I965, G4X (we put both under that tag usually). > > I would actually vote for the opposite. We often find bugs that are GT > specific in modern chips, and each of the early gen have different > features sets and their own quirks. > > So I would say split it by PCI ID, with human readable strings, both > codename (inc. target feature set, GT + ULT/ULX/Halo etc) and market name > (though given that 50% is just HD Graphics, very meh). > > So long as can intelligently group based on the PCI ID, I think it will > be of benefit long term. Seems like that'll result in massive lists. And we can always denote special-cases in the summary of the bug. Also maintaining all that information accurately will be a pain and for many bugs it's not needed, hence why I think a bit more coarseness would be good. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
