On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 08:08:59PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 17:59 +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 07:54:42PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 17:44 +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > > This code is all dead code since we want to go up to DC6, always. > > > > > > On BXT DC6 is not available, so we can only go to DC5. It's disabled on > > > BXT atm, since runtime PM isn't enabled either. > > > > I knew there was a catch! > > > > That code is pretty convoluted btw, it would make sense to have proper > > pre_disable/post_enabled hooks on power wells? > > Yes, it would make sense to simplify the code. I haven't thought about > adding new hooks, not sure how useful they would be on other platforms. > But to me it seems that the enable/disable parts in skl_set_power_well() > could be split out to the existing skl_power_well_{enable,disable}, have > you looked into that already? Nop, I haven't, but that's indeed a nice middle ground. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx