On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:31:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 02:32:03PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote: >> > Hi, >> > Next update of the series reviewed at >> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/22/155 >> > >> > Major changes are few review comments from Varka and Ville being addressed. Also except >> > for intel-gfx patches, all patches reviesion history is moved out of commit message. >> > >> > Hope this series finally finds its mark. >> > >> > Regards >> > Shobhit >> > >> > Shobhit Kumar (7): >> > gpiolib: Add support for removing registered consumer lookup table >> > mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: Add lookup table for Panel Control as GPIO >> > signal >> > mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Add PWM cell device for Crystalcove PMIC >> > mfd: intel_soc_pmic_core: ADD PWM lookup table for CRC PMIC based PWM >> > pwm: crc: Add Crystalcove (CRC) PWM driver >> > drm/i915: Use the CRC gpio for panel enable/disable >> > drm/i915: Backlight control using CRC PMIC based PWM driver >> >> I think we have r-b/acks on all the patches now. Ok if I pull this in >> through drm-intel.git for 4.3? Or should I make a topic branch with tag >> and then send out pull requests to everyone? Or will each maintainer merge >> on their own since it's all only coupled at runtime anyway? Any of these >> would suit me. > > I forgot to mention that I had a build failure due to > builtin_platform_driver() when I tried this (just changed it to > module_platform_driver() to get past it). So I'm not sure if this > now depends on some tree which isn't included in -nightly... These patches are based on linux-next/master Regards Shobhit _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
