On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 02:18:06PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:37:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:14:09AM +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > > > Looks good. > > > > > > Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:23:37PM +0300, Antti Koskipaa wrote: > > > > An OEM may request increased I_boost beyond the recommended values > > > > by specifying an I_boost value to be applied to all swing entries for > > > > a port. These override values are specified in VBT. > > > > > > > > Issue: VIZ-5676 > > > > Signed-off-by: Antti Koskipaa <antti.koskipaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > What depencies has this patch? Please either mention that or include this > > patch in whatever other patch series it needs, since I can't apply this. > > Maybe it also simply needs a rebase, but conflicts don't look like that. > > As mentioned in Antti's reply to the patch, it depends on > "drm/i915/skl: Buffer translation improvements". > > Antti's patch still applies against v2 of my patch, but with some slight > fuzz. Light fuzz I can handle. In the future can you pls just include Antti's patch when submitting yours in the same series? That way I won't miss it. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
