On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 07:45:42AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I have seen this typo once and added an entry to codespell's dictionary.txt file.
>
> $ diff -uprN /usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt.orig /usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt
> --- /usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt.orig 2015-06-09 20:49:25.000000000 +0200
> +++ /usr/share/codespell/dictionary.txt 2015-06-23 07:37:35.893689539 +0200
> @@ -625,6 +625,7 @@ burried->buried
> busineses->business, businesses,
> busness->business
> bussiness->business
> +cacheing->caching
> caculater->calculator
> cacuses->caucuses
> cahracters->characters
>
> There some other places where this typo occurs:
>
> [ src/sna/kgem.c ]
>
> 298:static void assert_cacheing(struct kgem *kgem, struct kgem_bo *bo)
> 324:#define assert_cacheing(kgem, bo)
> 2455: assert_cacheing(kgem, bo);
> 2841: assert_cacheing(kgem, bo);
>
> It's up to Chris what to do with this.
I just can't get paste reading 'caching' as two hard Cs and so it feels
weird.
commit f414ed4e40292e91e9c6850fb01a26334e6b43c7
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Jun 24 11:02:28 2015 +0100
sna: Fix misspelling of "caching"
Apply s/cacheing/caching/ because I am alone in my belief of how to
spell cacheing correctly :)
Suggested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
