To initialize WA batch, at the moment we first allocate batch and then check
whether we have any WA to be initialized for the given Gen; if we don't have
any WA then we WARN the user, destroy the batch and return but this is causing
another WARN in cleanup code complaining about sleeping in atomic context.
Till we understand this better and to keep things simpler, bail out early
if we don't have WA.
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 6bfa2f1..5298103 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1275,6 +1275,12 @@ static int intel_init_workaround_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
WARN_ON(ring->id != RCS);
+ /* update this when WA for higher Gen are added */
+ if (WARN(INTEL_INFO(ring->dev)->gen > 8,
+ "WA batch buffer is not initialized for Gen%d\n",
+ INTEL_INFO(ring->dev)->gen))
+ return 0;
+
/* some WA perform writes to scratch page, ensure it is valid */
if (ring->scratch.obj == NULL) {
DRM_ERROR("scratch page not allocated for %s\n", ring->name);
@@ -1305,11 +1311,6 @@ static int intel_init_workaround_bb(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
&offset);
if (ret)
goto out;
- } else {
- WARN(INTEL_INFO(ring->dev)->gen >= 8,
- "WA batch buffer is not initialized for Gen%d\n",
- INTEL_INFO(ring->dev)->gen);
- lrc_destroy_wa_ctx_obj(ring);
}
out:
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
