On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 04:49:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Guc is different since we really must have it ready for execbuf, and for > that usecase a completion at drm_open time sounds like the right thing. But do we? It would be nice if we had a definite answer that the hw was ready before we started using it in anger, but I don't see any reason why we would have to delay userspace for a slow microcode update... (This presupposes that userspace batches are unaffected by GuC/execlist setup, which for userspace sanity I hope they are - or at least using predicate registers and conditional execution.) -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
