From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The same dpll p2 divider selection is repeated three times in the
gen2-4 .find_dpll() functions. Factor it out.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 78 ++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 2fa81ed..2cc8ae7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -643,16 +643,12 @@ static bool intel_PLL_is_valid(struct drm_device *dev,
return true;
}
-static bool
-i9xx_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit,
- struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
- int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
- intel_clock_t *best_clock)
+static int
+i9xx_select_p2_div(const intel_limit_t *limit,
+ const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
+ int target)
{
- struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
- struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
- intel_clock_t clock;
- int err = target;
+ struct drm_device *dev = crtc_state->base.crtc->dev;
if (intel_pipe_will_have_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
/*
@@ -661,18 +657,31 @@ i9xx_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit,
* single/dual channel state, if we even can.
*/
if (intel_is_dual_link_lvds(dev))
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
+ return limit->p2.p2_fast;
else
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
+ return limit->p2.p2_slow;
} else {
if (target < limit->p2.dot_limit)
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
+ return limit->p2.p2_slow;
else
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
+ return limit->p2.p2_fast;
}
+}
+
+static bool
+i9xx_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit,
+ struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
+ int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
+ intel_clock_t *best_clock)
+{
+ struct drm_device *dev = crtc_state->base.crtc->dev;
+ intel_clock_t clock;
+ int err = target;
memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
+ clock.p2 = i9xx_select_p2_div(limit, crtc_state, target);
+
for (clock.m1 = limit->m1.min; clock.m1 <= limit->m1.max;
clock.m1++) {
for (clock.m2 = limit->m2.min;
@@ -712,30 +721,14 @@ pnv_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit,
int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
intel_clock_t *best_clock)
{
- struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
- struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
+ struct drm_device *dev = crtc_state->base.crtc->dev;
intel_clock_t clock;
int err = target;
- if (intel_pipe_will_have_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
- /*
- * For LVDS just rely on its current settings for dual-channel.
- * We haven't figured out how to reliably set up different
- * single/dual channel state, if we even can.
- */
- if (intel_is_dual_link_lvds(dev))
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
- else
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
- } else {
- if (target < limit->p2.dot_limit)
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
- else
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
- }
-
memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
+ clock.p2 = i9xx_select_p2_div(limit, crtc_state, target);
+
for (clock.m1 = limit->m1.min; clock.m1 <= limit->m1.max;
clock.m1++) {
for (clock.m2 = limit->m2.min;
@@ -773,28 +766,17 @@ g4x_find_best_dpll(const intel_limit_t *limit,
int target, int refclk, intel_clock_t *match_clock,
intel_clock_t *best_clock)
{
- struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
- struct drm_device *dev = crtc->base.dev;
+ struct drm_device *dev = crtc_state->base.crtc->dev;
intel_clock_t clock;
int max_n;
- bool found;
+ bool found = false;
/* approximately equals target * 0.00585 */
int err_most = (target >> 8) + (target >> 9);
- found = false;
-
- if (intel_pipe_will_have_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_LVDS)) {
- if (intel_is_dual_link_lvds(dev))
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
- else
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
- } else {
- if (target < limit->p2.dot_limit)
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_slow;
- else
- clock.p2 = limit->p2.p2_fast;
- }
memset(best_clock, 0, sizeof(*best_clock));
+
+ clock.p2 = i9xx_select_p2_div(limit, crtc_state, target);
+
max_n = limit->n.max;
/* based on hardware requirement, prefer smaller n to precision */
for (clock.n = limit->n.min; clock.n <= max_n; clock.n++) {
--
2.3.6
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
