Re: [PATCH v4] drm/i915 : Added Programming of the MOCS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:42 AM
To: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Antoine, Peter; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:  [PATCH v4] drm/i915 : Added Programming of the MOCS

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 08:59:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Failing to program the MOCS is non-fatal.The system will not
> > +	 * run at peak performance. So generate a warning and carry on.
> > +	 */
> 
> Is this really true? Userspace must make sure that they don't 
> inappropriately overwrite the caching settings using MOCS for 
> frontbuffers and in doing so causing coherency issues with the display 
> block. If we fail to program MOCS correctly then things won't look pretty.

I was under the presumption that the MOCS entries would default to UC, since that is the failsafe mode.
-Chris

No they will stay at the hardware defaults as specified in the Bspec.
Peter.

--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux