On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 09:20:44AM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 16/06/15 10:24, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 07:36:30PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >> +static void direct_interrupts_to_guc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >> +{
> >> + struct intel_engine_cs *ring;
> >> + int i, irqs;
> >> +
> >> + /* tell all command streamers to forward interrupts and vblank to GuC */
> >> + irqs = _MASKED_FIELD(GFX_FORWARD_VBLANK_MASK, GFX_FORWARD_VBLANK_ALWAYS);
> >> + irqs |= _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(GFX_INTERRUPT_STEERING);
> >> + for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
> >> + I915_WRITE(RING_MODE_GEN7(ring), irqs);
> >> +
> >> + /* tell DE to send (all) flip_done to GuC */
> >> + irqs = DERRMR_PIPEA_PRI_FLIP_DONE | DERRMR_PIPEA_SPR_FLIP_DONE |
> >> + DERRMR_PIPEB_PRI_FLIP_DONE | DERRMR_PIPEB_SPR_FLIP_DONE |
> >> + DERRMR_PIPEC_PRI_FLIP_DONE | DERRMR_PIPEC_SPR_FLIP_DONE;
> >> + /* Unmasked bits will cause GuC response message to be sent */
> >> + I915_WRITE(DE_GUCRMR, ~irqs);
> >
> > That's scary since userspace depends on a few more DERRMR events
> > (wait-for-scanline). Where will they end up?
> > -Chris
>
> This doesn't change any bits in DE_RRMR, or set the VBLANK or SCANLINE
> bits in the DE_GUCRMR, so those events should be unaffected. The GuC
> isn't interested in those, only in flip done.
Why does the guc care about flip_done? With atomic it'll get exactly none
of those, ever ...
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
