Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tools: print a warning for tools replaced by intel_reg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:58:51PM +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> On 15 June 2015 at 16:51, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:41:03AM +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
> >>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Wood <thomas.wood@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> I'd go even one step further and do an exec using the corresponding
> >> intel_reg commandline. On top of this patch ofc.
> >
> > IMO more work than it's worth.
> 
> I looked at this, but the output and options of intel_reg don't quite
> match those of tools it is replacing, so it's not an exact
> replacement.
> 
> 
> >
> >> Then we could nuke a lot of the existing boilerplate already and then
> >> perhaps nuke all the tools one release later on or so.
> >
> > Hmm didn't we already make a release with the warnings? I'd just nuke
> > the deprecated ones from git now.
> 
> Yes, the 1.11 release has the warnings.

Ah in that case let's just move ahead and nuke them all.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux