On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 01:25:38AM -0700, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
>> Daniel,
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 08:57:47AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > Can you please retest with
>> >
>> > commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
>> > Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
>> >
>> > drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
>> >
>> > Thanks, Daniel
>> >
>>
>> The bug is still present with that patch applied. And it is still
>> present up to linux-next 20150611.
>
> The patch was misapplied, so what's in the tree at the moment isn't what
> I sent to the list.
Auch, my bad.
So we should
1) revert
commit 0aedb1626566efd72b369c01992ee7413c82a0c5
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu May 28 18:32:36 2015 +0300
drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty
in v4.1
and
2) reapply http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/50659 to
drm-intel-next-fixes for v4.2.
Is that right?
BR,
Jani.
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
