On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 04:38:40PM +0200, Gabriel Laskar wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 16:29:31 +0200 > Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 03:51:08PM +0200, Gabriel Laskar wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 13:26:44 +0200 > > > Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > This patch adds many of the DRM and KMS ioctls. The rest can be added as > > > > needed. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drm.c | 519 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 519 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drm.c b/drm.c > > > > index fa98fb7..e550c34 100644 > > > > --- a/drm.c > > > > +++ b/drm.c > > > > @@ -82,6 +82,468 @@ int drm_is_driver(struct tcb *tcp, const char *name) > > > > return strcmp(name, drv) == 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static int drm_version(struct tcb *tcp, const unsigned int code, long arg) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct drm_version ver; > > > > + char *name, *date, *desc; > > > > + int ret; > > > > + > > > > + if (entering(tcp) || umove(tcp, arg, &ver)) > > > > + return 0; > > > > + > > > > + name = calloc(ver.name_len + 1, 1); > > > > > > We have some wrappers for that now, you can call xcalloc(), but it will > > > die if this does not work. Your version have the advantage of not kill > > > strace, and just not decode the argument. > > > > > > > If ok I'll keep it as calloc? As you say, dying here is not really neccessary. > > Yeah, that was mostly me thinking out loud. Imho, I would keep the > calloc(), but I don't know what Dmitry will prefer. Maybe for > consistency, it should be better to have an xcalloc(). The general rule is to call xcalloc() if die_out_of_memory() is the best way to handle the OOM condition. strace should neither attempt to allocate arbitrary large chunks of memory specified by user input nor die when such allocation requests fail. -- ldv
Attachment:
pgpvSYaONnQGv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx