On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 06:21:35PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index a232dc9..a018465 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -5627,6 +5627,10 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, unsigned int freq) > mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); > > intel_update_cdclk(dev); > + > + WARN(freq != dev_priv->cdclk_freq, > + "cdclk requested %d kHz but got %d kHz\n", > + freq, dev_priv->cdclk_freq); > } Could you add this to all the set_cdclk() functions? Maybe intel_check_cdclk() or something. > > void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > -- > 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
