Fwd: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix IPS related flicker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just noticed that I had forgotten to reply-all...

Jani, would you consider merge this fix with the explanation above
related to Ville's question?

or do you want/need any action here?

Thanks,
Rodrigo.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:45 AM
Subject: Re:  [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix IPS related flicker
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:07:11AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> We cannot let IPS enabled with no plane on the pipe:
>>
>> BSpec: "IPS cannot be enabled until after at least one plane has
>> been enabled for at least one vertical blank." and "IPS must be
>> disabled while there is still at least one plane enabled on the
>> same pipe as IPS." This restriction apply to HSW and BDW.
>>
>> However a shortcut path on update primary plane function
>> to make primary plane invisible by setting DSPCTRL to 0
>> was leting IPS enabled while there was no
>> other plane enabled on the pipe causing flickerings that we were
>> believing that it was caused by that other restriction where
>> ips cannot be used when pixel rate is greater than 95% of cdclok.
>>
>> v2: Don't mess with Atomic path as pointed out by Ville.
>>
>> Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85583
>> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     |  1 +
>>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 4e3f302..5a6b17b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -13309,6 +13309,16 @@ intel_check_primary_plane(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>                               intel_crtc->atomic.wait_vblank = true;
>>               }
>>
>> +             /*
>> +              * FIXME: Actually if we will still have any other plane enabled
>> +              * on the pipe we could let IPS enabled still, but for
>> +              * now lets consider that when we make primary invisible
>> +              * by setting DSPCNTR to 0 on update_primary_plane function
>> +              * IPS needs to be disable.
>> +              */
>> +             if (!state->visible || !fb)
>> +                     intel_crtc->atomic.disable_ips = true;
>> +
>
> How could it be visible without an fb?

I don't like this !fb here as well, but I just tried to keep exactly
same if statement that makes I915_WRITE(DSPCNTRL, 0) on update primary
plane func...

>
>>               intel_crtc->atomic.fb_bits |=
>>                       INTEL_FRONTBUFFER_PRIMARY(intel_crtc->pipe);
>>
>> @@ -13406,6 +13416,9 @@ static void intel_begin_crtc_commit(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
>>       if (intel_crtc->atomic.disable_fbc)
>>               intel_fbc_disable(dev);
>>
>> +     if (intel_crtc->atomic.disable_ips)
>> +             hsw_disable_ips(intel_crtc);
>> +
>>       if (intel_crtc->atomic.pre_disable_primary)
>>               intel_pre_disable_primary(crtc);
>
> intel_pre_disable_primary() would already disable IPS. Except no one
> sets .pre_disable_primary=true. OTOH that thing mostly seems to do
> stuff that has nothing to do with the primary plane (cxsr disable,
> fifo underrun reporting disable on gen2), so I don't think we want
> to use that.
>
> In any case we should really have the IPS state as part of the crtc
> state. These global disable_foo things should just be killed IMO.
> Hmm, except to do this properly we'd then need to track the hw IPS
> state separately somewhere.

agree.

>
> I guess we can just go with this for now. At least it's not really
> making things worse, so (maybe with the !fb check dropped):
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks

>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 2afb31a..1059283 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -485,6 +485,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_atomic_commit {
>>       /* Sleepable operations to perform before commit */
>>       bool wait_for_flips;
>>       bool disable_fbc;
>> +     bool disable_ips;
>>       bool pre_disable_primary;
>>       bool update_wm;
>>       unsigned disabled_planes;
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx



--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br


-- 
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux