On 05/28/2015 02:20 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 01:02:51PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> John, Tomas, where are we with this series? I believe this is a >> prerequisite for the request->fence conversion, and also the native sync >> work, both of which I need for some stuff I'm doing. > > It's a 60 patch series for ~800 line patch performing a single API > conversion. I call that unreviewable. > > It also misses the *bugfixes* and improvements from the original. Can you be more specific? The patches are relatively small, is it the interactions that are tough to review? And what bugfixes are missing? Maybe you mentioned them on the previous thread, but I don't have it handy to dig them out... Jesse _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
