On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 01:32:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > A simple functional test here which does: > a) an execbuf with just 1 batch. With full ppgtt you should get that one > at offset 0. If not, skip the testcase. > b) set the NO_ZEROMAP property. > c) re-run the same batch, assert that now the buffer is relocated to > something non-0. > > Just to make sure we have a bare minimal testcase to make sure we don't > break this. Maybe this should be added to another test rather than here? This test is described as a: "Basic test for context set/get param input validation." Somehow I feel that testing whether the *functionality* is correct does not belong in this test, but rather in some test case that's already related to execbufs, or even a dedicated test case. But that might be over-engineering. Opinions? Kind regards, David _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
