On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:58:30AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 05/27/2015 10:15 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:52:34AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > >>From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>These are the display call sites so should use the proper helper. > >> > >>Also requires intel_plane_obj_offset to assume normal view when > >>plane pointer is not available. > > > >Eugh. If only the plane stored the offset, bonus marks for storing the > >vma cookie, then we would not have to keep recomputing the view and > >searching every single time... > > Well, the patch even decreases the number of searches! :) > > And we don't recompute when querying the offset - it just figures out what > type of vma it should look for. So I think it doesn't prevent any future > caching improvements. It actually makes it easier since it consolidates the > query. > > I'll need this, or something like it, for some future work. So at the very > moment I am not too bothered if this goes in or not. Yeah unfortunately we can't eliminate the view searches completely since the view depends upon fb + plane_state. So not perfectly aligned with our hw ... Otherwise I'd agree, caching the view in the fb would be neat. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
