On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 04:58:46PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2015-05-07 14:38 GMT-03:00 Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > The orignal code started by storing the actual central frequency (in Hz,
> > using a uint64_t) in a uint32_t which codes for the register value. That
> > can't be right.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > index f3c5b49..a99fee1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> > @@ -1117,8 +1117,6 @@ static void skl_wrpll_params_populate(struct skl_wrpll_params *params,
> > {
> > uint64_t dco_freq;
> >
> > - params->central_freq = central_freq;
> > -
> > switch (central_freq) {
>
> While at it, since it's related, can I ask you to add a default case
> to this switch statement? You know, just to be sure... It can be in a
> separate patch. And I guess the discussion of patch 9 will define how
> that default case will look like.
>
> With or without it: Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
Merged the reviewed patches to dinq, thanks.
-Daniel
>
> > case 9600000000ULL:
> > params->central_freq = 0;
> > --
> > 2.1.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
>
>
> --
> Paulo Zanoni
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
