On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 06:38:39PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > This helps debugging. > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > index da7aa0f..ff5eb05 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c > @@ -1190,7 +1190,8 @@ found: > } > > if (min_dco_index > 2) { > - WARN(1, "No valid values found for the given pixel clock\n"); > + WARN(1, "No valid parameters found for pixel clock: %dHz\n", > + clock); Same complaint here, this should return false and get forwarded eventually to haswell_crtc_compute_clock. I'll leave patch 2&3 for now since they need to be reworked anyway. -Daniel > } else { > wrpll_params->central_freq = dco_central_freq[min_dco_index]; > > -- > 2.1.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx