On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Naming convention of csr firmware will be - > <platform>_dmc_<api-version>_<minor-version>.bin > > Accordingly updated the same in code. > > Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c > index fec2bc5..9bd05bf 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ > * low-power state and comes back to normal. > */ > > -#define I915_CSR_SKL "i915/skl_dmc_ver4.bin" > +#define I915_CSR_SKL "i915/skl_dmc_1_4.bin" I believe in this case the install instructions should point to copy instead of linking it, but not hardcode the release version. So shouldn't it be i915/skl_dmc_ver1.bin then? or i915/skl_dmc_ver1_4.bin in worst case... > > MODULE_FIRMWARE(I915_CSR_SKL); > > -- > 2.0.2 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Rodrigo Vivi Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
