On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:38:45PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:43:00AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:08:42AM +0300, David Weinehall wrote: > [snip] > > > Not exactly sure what you suggest here? > > > > That you have an unmitigated security hole in your design. > > No, I meant what you suggest as a remedy. You place your own buffer at address 0 i.e. you explicitly control the layout and reject the batch if it is outside of your control. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
