On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:49:30PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:30:10PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 07:57:13PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > > We decided that liked the explicit list of IDs better than the encoded > > > one. The DDX may like this as well, if just to keep the files identical. > > > > The point is that it is an exact copy. I have been referencing the > > kernel commit that we sync to each time, e.g. > > > > commit abc9b3f5753d602da296d50c8769cefb88ec473d > > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri Sep 26 09:22:50 2014 +0100 > > > > Add Skylake PCI IDs > > > > From kernel commit 72bbf0af0c76cbefe9cecbd2ed670b7555e03625 > > Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Wed Feb 13 15:27:37 2013 +0000 > > > > drm/i915/skl: Add the Skylake PCI ids > > > > Just do the same for adding Boxton PCI ids, and give them .gen = 0111 > > I guess we'll have to wait for the BXT kernel patch to have a real hash? Yes, I like the cascade of authority from the kernel. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
