On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 07:54:46AM +0100, Peter Antoine wrote: > This is a resubmission of the security fixed for a Kernel Crash found in the > drm part of the driver. It was caused by a attempt to Lock/Unlock a HW_LOCK > that was uninitialised. As this feature is only required on some legacy drivers > this patchset now only turns these features off. > > There is an igt test to follow, just working out a way of not crashing the > systems that have this feature-set turned on (probably need to create a context > and if that succeeds then exit as the feature is on. > > V2: Remove the patches that cover the Kernel Crash and the Lock Escalation. > Remove the PARAM that was used by the test to detect the presences of this > feature. Process nit: When resending the entire patch series anew please start a new thread. That avoids confusion with the discussion on the old patches (I've managed to wreak havoc and merge a mix of old&new patches this way already). in-reply-to resending is just for resending parts of the series when you do a quick update of a patch. -Daniel > > Peter Antoine (2): > drm: Make HW_LOCK access functions optional. > drm: Make Legacy Context access functions optional. > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_context.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 12 +++++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_lock.c | 6 ++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 3 ++- > include/drm/drmP.h | 23 +++++++++++----------- > 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.9.1 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
