On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:09:30PM +0100, daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > > The test has 4 subparts, one for each ring, but internally they all > submit to ring 0. Fix it to use the provided ring_id > --- > tests/gem_cs_tlb.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/gem_cs_tlb.c b/tests/gem_cs_tlb.c > index 3df4f37..62f446c 100644 > --- a/tests/gem_cs_tlb.c > +++ b/tests/gem_cs_tlb.c > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static void run_on_ring(int fd, unsigned ring_id, const char *ring_name) > gem_close(fd, handle); > } > > - igt_assert_eq(exec(fd, handle_new, split, >t_offset_new, 0), > + igt_assert_eq(exec(fd, handle_new, split, >t_offset_new, ring_id), Oops. Thanks for fixing this, applied. -Daniel > 0); > > if (split > 0) { > -- > 1.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx