On Tue, 12 May 2015, Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On ke, 2015-05-06 at 15:33 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Do no expose invalid gmbus pins as i2c devices to userspace. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > Looks ok, on both 1/2 and 2/2: > Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> Daniel, please fix 's/Do no/Do not/' in commit messages while applying. Thanks, Jani. > >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c >> index 76070c4e76b3..92072f56e418 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c >> @@ -56,6 +56,12 @@ static const struct gmbus_pin gmbus_pins_bdw[] = { >> [GMBUS_PIN_DPD] = { "dpd", GPIOF }, >> }; >> >> +static const struct gmbus_pin gmbus_pins_skl[] = { >> + [GMBUS_PIN_DPC] = { "dpc", GPIOD }, >> + [GMBUS_PIN_DPB] = { "dpb", GPIOE }, >> + [GMBUS_PIN_DPD] = { "dpd", GPIOF }, >> +}; >> + >> static const struct gmbus_pin gmbus_pins_bxt[] = { >> [GMBUS_PIN_1_BXT] = { "dpb", PCH_GPIOB }, >> [GMBUS_PIN_2_BXT] = { "dpc", PCH_GPIOC }, >> @@ -68,6 +74,8 @@ static const struct gmbus_pin *get_gmbus_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >> { >> if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) >> return &gmbus_pins_bxt[pin]; >> + else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) >> + return &gmbus_pins_skl[pin]; >> else if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) >> return &gmbus_pins_bdw[pin]; >> else >> @@ -81,6 +89,8 @@ bool intel_gmbus_is_valid_pin(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >> >> if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv)) >> size = ARRAY_SIZE(gmbus_pins_bxt); >> + else if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv)) >> + size = ARRAY_SIZE(gmbus_pins_skl); >> else if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) >> size = ARRAY_SIZE(gmbus_pins_bdw); >> else > > -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx