Hi,
On 05/01/2015 04:43 AM, Chandra Konduru wrote:
> This patch adds NV12 as supported format to
> intel_framebuffer_init and performs various checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chandra Konduru <chandra.konduru@xxxxxxxxx>
> Testcase: igt/kms_nv12
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index d3773d2..6e693c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -13953,6 +13953,33 @@ static int intel_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> break;
> + case DRM_FORMAT_NV12:
> + if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 9) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("unsupported pixel format: %s\n",
> + drm_get_format_name(mode_cmd->pixel_format));
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (!mode_cmd->offsets[1]) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("uv start offset not set\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (mode_cmd->pitches[0] != mode_cmd->pitches[1] ||
> + mode_cmd->handles[0] != mode_cmd->handles[1]) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("y and uv subplanes have different parameters\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (mode_cmd->modifier[1] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED &&
> + (mode_cmd->offsets[1] & 0xFFF)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("tile-Yf uv offset 0x%x isn't starting on new tile-row\n",
> + mode_cmd->offsets[1]);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (mode_cmd->modifier[1] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED &&
> + ((mode_cmd->offsets[1] % mode_cmd->pitches[1]) % 4)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("tile-Y uv offset 0x%x isn't 4-line aligned\n",
> + mode_cmd->offsets[1]);
> + }
> + break;
> default:
> DRM_DEBUG("unsupported pixel format: %s\n",
> drm_get_format_name(mode_cmd->pixel_format));
>
I've noticed a bunch of:
[ 566.106745] [drm:drm_mode_addfb2] [FB:58]
[ 566.111384] [drm:drm_fb_get_bpp_depth] unsupported pixel format NV12 little-endian (0x3231564e)
[ 566.121283] [drm:drm_mode_addfb2] [FB:59]
[ 566.125912] [drm:drm_fb_get_bpp_depth] unsupported pixel format NV12 little-endian (0x3231564e)
And on investigating, they probably come from drm_helper_mode_fill_fb_struct
in intel_framebuffer_init.
Result is that fb->depth and fb->bits_per_pixel will be zero, which can't be good. :)
Anyway, looks like this needs some additional work to make NV12 really supported.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
