On 05/06/2015 07:48 AM, Patrik Jakobsson wrote: > This patch set aims to make strace more useful when tracing i915 ioctls. > The ioctl type is first checked for being drm and then the driver > backing the opened device is identified by looking at sysfs. Other > drivers than i915 can easily be added. > > Only a subset of the i915 ioctls are included. I will extend this patch > set if the approach looks ok. The generic drm ioctls are also missing. > > Give it a spin with: > strace -e trace=ioctl -p `pidof X` > > Patrik Jakobsson (2): > strace/drm: Print extended info for drm and i915 ioctls > strace/drm: Print args for most common i915 ioctls > > Makefile.am | 2 + > defs.h | 2 + > drm.c | 104 +++++++++++++++++ > drm_i915.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > ioctl.c | 5 + > xlat/drm_i915_getparams.in | 28 +++++ > xlat/drm_i915_ioctls.in | 51 +++++++++ > xlat/drm_i915_setparams.in | 4 + > 8 files changed, 474 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drm.c > create mode 100644 drm_i915.c > create mode 100644 xlat/drm_i915_getparams.in > create mode 100644 xlat/drm_i915_ioctls.in > create mode 100644 xlat/drm_i915_setparams.in Yeah, this looks pretty cool to me. I'm not familiar with strace internals, but the split and extensible design looks reasonable; should make it easy to add other drivers and such in the future. Who on the strace side can pick this up? Thanks, Jesse _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
