On Tue, 05 May 2015, Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 02:39:48PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> There's still the question whether we can default to using the vbt value >> if that can be broken... > > This is a workaround for SDPs loaded with a "default" VBT which doesn't > correspond to the full fleet of SPDs. For actual product, it's really > expected to have a VBT with a correct low vswing bit set, otherwise the > panel won't lit up (even on Windows!). > > It's probably a good idea to add a comment saying that's it's a > workaround for early platform with generic-ish VBT. Something that we > should remove in a bit. Thanks for the clarification, Damien. That settles the default then. I'd still like the module parameter to be effective even if changed runtime. BR, Jani. > > -- > Damien -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
