On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 16:18 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:06:10AM +0300, Mika Kahola wrote: > > This patch adds information on current CD clock > > frequency to debugfs i915_frequency_info > > > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > index 9c2b9e4..18c7531 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > > @@ -1266,6 +1266,9 @@ static int i915_frequency_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) > > seq_puts(m, "no P-state info available\n"); > > } > > > > + seq_printf(m, "CD clock freq: %dkHz\n", > > + dev_priv->display.get_display_clock_speed(dev)); > > Shouldn't we also dump the computed/requested cdclk in > dev_priv->cdclk_freq while at it? Seems useful enough otherwise. > -Daniel Yes, that would be useful information. I'll throw a patch that covers these clocks as well. -Mika- > > + > > out: > > intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); > > return ret; > > -- > > 1.9.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
