Though we don't have precise tracking for when buffers in the cache list
become idle (we don't have request tracking at this layer), we do have
some basic assumptions that the head is inactive and the tail active. So
when inserting buffers in the cache, it would be good not to completely
ignore those assumptions.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
index 61a248f..2cbe973 100644
--- a/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
+++ b/intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c
@@ -1329,7 +1329,10 @@ drm_intel_gem_bo_unreference_final(drm_intel_bo *bo, time_t time)
bo_gem->name = NULL;
bo_gem->validate_index = -1;
- DRMLISTADDTAIL(&bo_gem->head, &bucket->head);
+ if (drm_intel_gem_bo_busy(&bo_gem->bo))
+ DRMLISTADDTAIL(&bo_gem->head, &bucket->head);
+ else
+ DRMLISTADD(&bo_gem->head, &bucket->head);
} else {
drm_intel_gem_bo_free(bo);
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
