On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 02:01:43PM +0100, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote: > On 4/23/2015 12:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>+ memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf)); > >>+ execbuf.buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t)exec; > >>+ execbuf.buffer_count = 1; > >>+ execbuf.batch_len = sizeof(batch_data); > >>+ execbuf.flags = 0; > >These two can also happily disappear. > > Ok for the execbuf.flags and for the other fixes, but why remove > also execbuf.batch_len? Then we get flagged as a no-op batch. It's just a piece of sleight-of-hand. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
