On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:30:01AM +0100, daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > > Using imported objects should not leak i915 vmas (and vms). > > In practice this simulates Xorg importing fbcon and leaking (or not) one vma > per Xorg startup cycle. > > v2: use low-level ioctl wrappers and bo offset to check the leak (Chris) > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@xxxxxxxxx> (v2) > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/gem_ppgtt.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tests/gem_ppgtt.c b/tests/gem_ppgtt.c > index 5bf773c..b865af3 100644 > --- a/tests/gem_ppgtt.c > +++ b/tests/gem_ppgtt.c > @@ -48,6 +48,22 @@ > #define HEIGHT 512 > #define SIZE (HEIGHT*STRIDE) > > +static bool uses_full_ppgtt(int fd) > +{ > + struct drm_i915_getparam gp; > + int val = 0; > + > + memset(&gp, 0, sizeof(gp)); > + gp.param = 18; /* HAS_ALIASING_PPGTT */ > + gp.value = &val; > + > + if (drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GETPARAM, &gp)) > + return 0; > + > + errno = 0; > + return val > 1; > +} > + > static drm_intel_bo *create_bo(drm_intel_bufmgr *bufmgr, > uint32_t pixel) > { > @@ -200,6 +216,86 @@ static void surfaces_check(dri_bo **bo, int count, uint32_t expected) > } > } > > + > +static uint64_t exec_and_get_offset(int fd, uint32_t batch, uint32_t bo) > +{ > + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf; > + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 exec[2]; > + struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry reloc[1]; > + uint32_t buf[6], i = 0; > + > + /* use a simple MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM to write something on the bo. > + * We just want to get a VMA > + */ > + buf[i++] = MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM | 2; > + buf[i++] = 0; > + buf[i++] = 0; > + buf[i++] = 0xdeadbeef; > + > + reloc->offset = 1 * sizeof(uint32_t); > + reloc->delta = 0; > + reloc->target_handle = bo; > + reloc->read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION; > + reloc->write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_INSTRUCTION; > + reloc->presumed_offset = 0; A relocation (and the STORE) is not required. The kernel will do all reservations (of exec_object[]) before doing relocations. Not relocating makes life more predictable (fewer error conditions may strike). > +static void flink_and_close(void) > +{ > + uint32_t fd, fd2; > + uint32_t batch, bo, flinked_bo, new_bo, name; > + uint64_t offset, offset_new; > + > + fd = drm_open_any(); > + igt_require(uses_full_ppgtt(fd)); The test equally applies to !full-ppgtt. The bug we saw isn't possible, but the interface expectations are the same. > + bo = gem_create(fd, 4096); > + name = gem_flink(fd, bo); > + > + fd2 = drm_open_any(); > + batch = gem_create(fd2, 4096); > + > + flinked_bo = gem_open(fd2, name); > + offset = exec_and_get_offset(fd2, batch, flinked_bo); > + gem_close(fd2, flinked_bo); > + gem_sync(fd2, batch); > + > + /* the flinked bo VMA should have been cleared now, so a new bo of the > + * same size should get the same offset > + */ > + new_bo = gem_create(fd2, 4096); > + offset_new = exec_and_get_offset(fd2, batch, new_bo); > + gem_close(fd2, new_bo); > + > + igt_assert(offset == offset_new); igt_assert_eq Nice test. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx