These two patches still have something to work on, or could they be
committed?
On ke, 2015-04-08 at 15:55 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Add suffix and complementary function for CPU domain.
>
> v2:
> - Change function signatures to be consistent with the rest
>
> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c b/tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> index 55c66a2..115e398 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_mmap_gtt.c
> @@ -43,11 +43,18 @@
>
> static int OBJECT_SIZE = 16*1024*1024;
>
> -static void set_domain(int fd, uint32_t handle)
> +static void
> +set_domain_gtt(int fd, uint32_t handle)
> {
> gem_set_domain(fd, handle, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT);
> }
>
> +static void
> +set_domain_cpu(int fd, uint32_t handle)
> +{
> + gem_set_domain(fd, handle, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU, I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU);
> +}
> +
> static void *
> mmap_bo(int fd, uint32_t handle)
> {
> @@ -245,7 +252,7 @@ test_write_gtt(int fd)
>
> /* prefault object into gtt */
> dst_gtt = mmap_bo(fd, dst);
> - set_domain(fd, dst);
> + set_domain_gtt(fd, dst);
> memset(dst_gtt, 0, OBJECT_SIZE);
> munmap(dst_gtt, OBJECT_SIZE);
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
