On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 01:23:50PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 04:20:27PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Synchronising to an object active on the same ring is a no-op, for the > > benefit of execbuffer scheduler. However, for CS flips this means that > > we can forgo checking whether the last write request of the object is > > actually queued and more importantly whether the cache flush for the > > write was emitted. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Does this go boom in reality, i.e. bugzilla/igt? If so I guess this should > be for 4.1+cc:stable? Otherwise I think I'll punt since olr is on its > demise anyway. Who can say for sure? Maybe https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80948 it is cache dirt(?) without a known cause. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
