On Wed, 08 Apr 2015, Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On ke, 2015-04-08 at 13:58 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > All non-GMCH platforms have the same register layout for HPD long/short
>> > status, so let's use this condition instead of HAS_PCH_SPLIT, as the
>> > latter doesn't apply for BXT.
>> >
>> > Noticed by Daniel.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> > index 4833e2b..17eed72 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
>> > @@ -1446,7 +1446,7 @@ static inline void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_device *dev,
>> > if (port && dev_priv->hpd_irq_port[port]) {
>> > bool long_hpd;
>> >
>> > - if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
>> > + if (!HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv)) {
>> > dig_shift = pch_port_to_hotplug_shift(port);
>>
>> This is (will be) broken for port A.
>
> HPD on port A is not supported atm on any platforms. On BXT we also WARN
> if someone tried to enable it in bxt_hpd_irq_setup(). I think adding
> support for this is a separate (follow-up) issue.
Fair enough.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>>
>> > long_hpd = (dig_hotplug_reg >> dig_shift) & PORTB_HOTPLUG_LONG_DETECT;
>> > } else {
>> > --
>> > 2.1.0
>> >
>>
>
>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
