On 19/03/2015 12:30, John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
The submission portion of the execbuffer code path was abstracted into a
function pointer indirection as part of the legacy vs execlist work. The two
implementation functions are called 'i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission' and
'intel_execlists_submission' but the pointer was called 'do_execbuf'. There is
already a 'i915_gem_do_execbuffer' function (which is what calls the pointer
indirection). The name of the pointer is therefore considered to be backwards
and should be changed.
This patch renames it to 'execbuf_submit' which is hopefully a bit clearer.
For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 14 +++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index eb38cd1..1a23445 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1812,13 +1812,13 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
/* Abstract the submission mechanism (legacy ringbuffer or execlists) away */
struct {
- int (*do_execbuf)(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
- struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
- struct intel_context *ctx,
- struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
- struct list_head *vmas,
- struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
- u64 exec_start, u32 flags);
+ int (*execbuf_submit)(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
+ struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
+ struct intel_context *ctx,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
+ struct list_head *vmas,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
+ u64 exec_start, u32 flags);
int (*init_rings)(struct drm_device *dev);
void (*cleanup_ring)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
void (*stop_ring)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 092f25c..51cdfb7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -4837,12 +4837,12 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
}
if (!i915.enable_execlists) {
- dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf = i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission;
+ dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit = i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission;
dev_priv->gt.init_rings = i915_gem_init_rings;
dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_cleanup_ring_buffer;
dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_stop_ring_buffer;
} else {
- dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf = intel_execlists_submission;
+ dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit = intel_execlists_submission;
dev_priv->gt.init_rings = intel_logical_rings_init;
dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_logical_ring_cleanup;
dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_logical_ring_stop;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 9838d11..38e2178 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1594,9 +1594,9 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
} else
exec_start += i915_gem_obj_offset(batch_obj, vm);
- ret = dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf(dev, file, ring, ctx, args,
- &eb->vmas, batch_obj, exec_start,
- dispatch_flags);
+ ret = dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit(dev, file, ring, ctx, args,
+ &eb->vmas, batch_obj, exec_start,
+ dispatch_flags);
/*
* FIXME: We crucially rely upon the active tracking for the (ppgtt)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Tomas
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
