On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 20:31 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:11:57PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Let userspace know the status of Panel Self-Refresh by virtue of a
> > property on the appropriate connector.
> >
> > v2: Only attach the property if the driver is capable of PSR.
> > v3: Add docbook courtesy of Damien.
> > v4: Mark the initial value as 'unsupported' - it will be determined
> > correctly when we later read the DCPD from the panel.
> > v5: Done by Rodrigo:
> > - Add disabled state to match all cases
> > - Attach it anyway to eDP since it is started as unsupported
> > - Change prop name to PSR
> > - Add enum to make states more clear
> > - Rebased on intel_psr.c changing func name and fixing states
> >
> > +void intel_attach_psr_property(struct drm_connector *connector)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > + struct drm_property *prop;
> > +
> > + prop = dev_priv->psr.property;
> > + if (prop == NULL) {
> > + prop = drm_property_create_enum(dev,
> > + DRM_MODE_PROP_ENUM |
> > + DRM_MODE_PROP_IMMUTABLE,
> > + "PSR",
> > + psr_names,
> > + ARRAY_SIZE(psr_names));
>
> Are you sure you want the user visible string to be "PSR"? Googling
> prefers "Panel Self-Refresh".
To be honest, no I'm not sure... something I regretted already... Sorry!
Also talking about visible names I'm not sure about "Idle" as well...
Every time I read it get confused... I believe it is because PSR active
needs Idle usage...
What do you think about changing to Idle to Enable-Exit and Active to
Enable-Active?
> -Chris
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
