On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:48:31PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:10:28PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:22:30AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >>> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >>> >> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:15:32AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:34:27PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > >>> >>> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> <snip> >> > >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> Xi Ruoyao (1): >> > >>> >>> >> >> drm/i915: Ensure plane->state->fb stays in sync with plane->fb >> > >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> Turns out to be that commit. >> > >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> git bisect start 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915/' >> > >>> >>> >> # good: [b314acaccd7e0d55314d96be4a33b5f50d0b3344] Merge branch >> > >>> >>> >> 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input >> > >>> >>> >> git bisect good b314acaccd7e0d55314d96be4a33b5f50d0b3344 >> > >>> >>> >> # bad: [bc465aa9d045feb0e13b4a8f32cc33c1943f62d6] Linux 4.0-rc5 >> > >>> >>> >> git bisect bad bc465aa9d045feb0e13b4a8f32cc33c1943f62d6 >> > >>> >>> >> # bad: [319c1d420a0b62d9dbb88104afebaabc968cdbfa] drm/i915: Ensure >> > >>> >>> >> plane->state->fb stays in sync with plane->fb >> > >>> >>> >> git bisect bad 319c1d420a0b62d9dbb88104afebaabc968cdbfa >> > >>> >>> >> # first bad commit: [319c1d420a0b62d9dbb88104afebaabc968cdbfa] >> > >>> >>> >> drm/i915: Ensure plane->state->fb stays in sync with plane->fb >> > >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> Doing a straight revert on top of 4.0-rc5 makes things work again, >> > >>> >>> >> albeit with the WARN_ON(obj->frontbuffer_bits) splat still being >> > >>> >>> >> there. >> > >>> >>> > >> > >>> >>> > Can you please test the tip of drm-fixes: >> > >>> >>> > >> > >>> >>> > commit 8218c3f4df3bb1c637c17552405039a6dd3c1ee1 >> > >>> >>> > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> >> > >>> >>> > Date: Fri Feb 27 12:58:13 2015 +0100 >> > >>> >>> > >> > >>> >>> > drm: Fixup racy refcounting in plane_force_disable >> > >>> >>> > >> > >>> >>> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux/commit/?h=drm-fixes&id=8218c3f4df3bb1c637c17552405039a6dd3c1ee1 >> > >>> >>> > >> > >>> >>> > Because fumble that patch didn't make it to drm-fixes a while ago and >> > >>> >>> > instead landed in drm-next. >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> That seems to have helped with totally different issues a macbook I >> > >>> >>> have was seeing. However, it still doesn't fix the issue with the >> > >>> >>> Celeron based NUC machine. >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> I built a kernel based on Linus' latest tree as of this morning, >> > >>> >>> without reverting 319c1d4 and adding the commit you pointed to. The >> > >>> >>> NUC still won't boot without HDMI connected. With HDMI connected I >> > >>> >>> still see the trace below. If I do the blacklist and then insmod >> > >>> >>> dance with HDMI unplugged it shows the same spew I reported yesterday >> > >>> >>> which starts with the same backtrace. >> > >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> I'll try building a kernel with 319c1d4 reverted + your patch. I >> > >>> >>> suspect things will work fine with that combination because the two >> > >>> >>> issues are unrelated. >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> Can you please boot with drm.debug=0xff for the below case and grab >> > >>> >> complete dmesg? There'll be a lot of crap in the logs, you might need to >> > >>> >> blow up the logbuf size massively. But that log should contain everything >> > >>> >> I need to figure out where that framebuffer we're blowing up on is going. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > I provided both with HDMI attached and without (via insmod). If you >> > >>> > want them emailed directly let me know, but they were large. >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Boot with drm.debug=0xff and HDMI connected: >> > >>> > >> > >>> > https://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/pub/drm-ff-dmesg.txt >> > >>> > >> > >>> > Boot with drm.debug=0xff without HDMI connected and i915 loaded via >> > >>> > manual insmod after boot: >> > >>> > >> > >>> > https://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/pub/drm-ff-no-hdmi-insmod.txt >> > >>> >> > >>> Here's one more from the macbook I mentioned. It's showing the same >> > >>> kref.h splat: >> > >>> >> > >>> https://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/pub/drm-ff-macbook.txt >> > >> >> > >> Ok there's at least one fixup for which we've failed to apply when porting >> > >> the fb refcounting fix from -next. Can you please cherry-pick >> > >> >> > >> commit f55548b5af87ebfc586ca75748947f1c1b1a4a52 >> > >> Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> Date: Thu Feb 5 18:30:20 2015 +0000 >> > >> >> > >> drm/i915: Don't try to reference the fb in get_initial_plane_config() >> > >> >> > >> From linux-next? >> > > >> > > Yes, building now. Will let you know as soon as I test it on both machines. >> > >> > OK, with that commit applied I no longer get the kref.h splat and the >> > NUC machine boots headless. I still see the backtrace below on both >> > the NUC and the macbook. I have a copy of it with drm.debug=0xff from >> > the NUC here: >> > >> > https://jwboyer.fedorapeople.org/pub/nuc-drm-debug-ff-with-fixes.txt >> > >> > Getting better at least :). >> >> Ok thanks for testing. I'll look at that one tomorrow, wasted too much >> time with trying to resurrect a few machines that should have matched the >> common parts of what goes wrong here. >> >> Jani, can you please cherry-pick the above commit to -fixes? > > Actually add Jani this time around ... > -Daniel > >> >> One more question: Is the frontbuffer_bits splat now also gone? That was >> the one I have no clue about, but since somewhere around 4.0-rc it started >> poppping up in a few places ... Thus far it was always the canary for some >> other bug though. As far as I can tell, it's gone. I don't see it on any of my i915 machines running the kernel with those two patches. I'll keep an eye out for it as we work through 4.0-rcX. josh _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx