Now that the kernel provides DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(), drop the internal
implementation and use the kernel one.
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 8 +-------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
index 40580794e23d..b8a5fa15ca24 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -190,12 +190,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct menu_device, menu_devices);
static void menu_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev);
-/* This implements DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST but avoids 64 bit division */
-static u64 div_round64(u64 dividend, u32 divisor)
-{
- return div_u64(dividend + (divisor / 2), divisor);
-}
-
/*
* Try detecting repeating patterns by keeping track of the last 8
* intervals, and checking if the standard deviation of that set
@@ -317,7 +311,7 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
* operands are 32 bits.
* Make sure to round up for half microseconds.
*/
- data->predicted_us = div_round64((uint64_t)data->next_timer_us *
+ data->predicted_us = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((uint64_t)data->next_timer_us *
data->correction_factor[data->bucket],
RESOLUTION * DECAY);
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
