[PATCH] drm/i915: Use usleep_range() in wait_for()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

msleep() can sleep for way too long, so switch wait_for() to use
usleep_range() instead. Following a totally unscientific method
I just picked the range as W-2W.

This cuts the i915 init time on my BSW to almost half:
- initcall i915_init+0x0/0xa8 [i915] returned 0 after 419977 usecs
+ initcall i915_init+0x0/0xa8 [i915] returned 0 after 238419 usecs

Note that I didn't perform any other benchmarks on this so far.

Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index 6f20f3a..d2a4de0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@
 				ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT;			\
 			break;						\
 		}							\
-		if (W && drm_can_sleep())  {				\
-			msleep(W);					\
+		if ((W) && drm_can_sleep()) {				\
+			usleep_range((W)*1000, (W)*2000);		\
 		} else {						\
 			cpu_relax();					\
 		}							\
-- 
2.0.5

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux