On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:50 +0000, Nick Hoath wrote:
> On 17/03/2015 09:39, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index b89ab4d..3d4a7c3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static void skl_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
> > GEN8_LQSC_RO_PERF_DIS);
> > }
> >
> > +static void bxt_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
> > +{
> > + gen9_init_clock_gating(dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void i915_pineview_get_mem_freq(struct drm_device *dev)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > @@ -6503,7 +6508,12 @@ void intel_init_pm(struct drm_device *dev)
> > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9) {
> > skl_setup_wm_latency(dev);
> >
> > - dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating = skl_init_clock_gating;
> > + if (IS_BROXTON(dev))
> > + dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating =
> > + bxt_init_clock_gating;
> > + else
> > + dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating =
> > + skl_init_clock_gating;
>
> This doesn't match the style in: "HardWare WorkAround ring
> initialisation for Broxton", where we explicitly check the IS_BROXTON
> and IS_SKYLAKE state.
Ok, will fix this to set skl_init_clock_gating only for IS_SKYLAKE.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
