Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/i915: Agressive downclocking on Baytrail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Wednesday 18 March 2015 04:53 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 04:45:08PM +0530, Deepak S wrote:
+	if (val != dev_priv->rps.cur_freq) {
  		vlv_punit_write(dev_priv, PUNIT_REG_GPU_FREQ_REQ, val);
+		gen6_set_rps_thresholds(dev_priv, val);
I think gen6_set_rps_thresholds should be under baytrail specific with platform check?
The only difference for cherryview is that it doesn't use
GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO. Was that intentional?

The whole idea is that RPS should be autotuning for different workloads,
but those metrics are equivalent across GPU.
-Chris

Atleast based on the spec GEN6_RP_MEDIA_TURBO left out of CHV. I am yet to look at the latest Spec.

Also, Most of RP register for CHV falls under Comman well, I hope re-adjusting the rps_threshold will
not causing power issues since we have to wakeup both RENDER/MEDIA to access the register

-Deepak

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux