On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:53:16AM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > drm_vblank_count_and_time() doesn't return the correct sequence number > while the vblank interrupt is disabled, does it? It returns the sequence > number from the last time vblank_disable_and_save() was called (when the > vblank interrupt was disabled). That's why drm_vblank_get() is needed here. Ville enlightened me as well. I thought the value was cooked so that time did not pass whilst the IRQ was disabled. Hopefully, I can impress upon the Intel folks, at least, that enabling/disabling the interrupts just to read the current hw counter is interesting to say the least and sits at the top of the profiles when benchmarking Present. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx