On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:26:49PM +0530, Deepak S wrote: > On Friday 06 March 2015 08:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > I think we should modify adj in GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED? > if not not we might request higher freq since we add adj to new_delay before request freq. Oh yeah. That branch didn't exist when I first wrote the patch, and didn't exist at the end of the series so I never saw it! For this point in the patch series, yes, we do need to set adj=0. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
