Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Use down ei for manual Baytrail RPS calculations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Friday 06 March 2015 08:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Use both up/down manual ei calcuations for symmetry and greater
flexibility for reclocking, instead of faking the down interrupt based
on a fixed integer number of up interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  2 --
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 15 ++-------------
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |  1 -
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |  5 ++---
  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 73292a183492..efa98c9e5777 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1028,8 +1028,6 @@ struct intel_gen6_power_mgmt {
  	u8 rp0_freq;		/* Non-overclocked max frequency. */
  	u32 cz_freq;
- u32 ei_interrupt_count;
-
  	int last_adj;
  	enum { LOW_POWER, BETWEEN, HIGH_POWER } power;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
index 4b7b86298b37..8892dbdfb629 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
@@ -1033,7 +1033,6 @@ void gen6_rps_reset_ei(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  {
  	vlv_c0_read(dev_priv, &dev_priv->rps.down_ei);
  	dev_priv->rps.up_ei = dev_priv->rps.down_ei;
-	dev_priv->rps.ei_interrupt_count = 0;
  }
static u32 vlv_wa_c0_ei(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pm_iir)
@@ -1041,23 +1040,13 @@ static u32 vlv_wa_c0_ei(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pm_iir)
  	struct intel_rps_ei now;
  	u32 events = 0;
- if ((pm_iir & GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED) == 0)
+	if ((pm_iir & (GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_EI_EXPIRED | GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED)) == 0)
  		return 0;
vlv_c0_read(dev_priv, &now);
  	if (now.cz_clock == 0)
  		return 0;
- /*
-	 * To down throttle, C0 residency should be less than down threshold
-	 * for continous EI intervals. So calculate down EI counters
-	 * once in VLV_INT_COUNT_FOR_DOWN_EI
-	 */
-	if (++dev_priv->rps.ei_interrupt_count >= VLV_INT_COUNT_FOR_DOWN_EI) {
-		pm_iir |= GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_EI_EXPIRED;
-		dev_priv->rps.ei_interrupt_count = 0;
-	}
-
  	if (pm_iir & GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_EI_EXPIRED) {
  		if (!vlv_c0_above(dev_priv,
  				  &dev_priv->rps.down_ei, &now,
@@ -4247,7 +4236,7 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
  	/* Let's track the enabled rps events */
  	if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) && !IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
  		/* WaGsvRC0ResidencyMethod:vlv */
-		dev_priv->pm_rps_events = GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED;
+		dev_priv->pm_rps_events = GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_EI_EXPIRED | GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED;
  	else
  		dev_priv->pm_rps_events = GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 324922d8f8a1..ca24a2d4a823 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -665,7 +665,6 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells {
  #define VLV_CZ_CLOCK_TO_MILLI_SEC		100000
  #define VLV_RP_UP_EI_THRESHOLD			90
  #define VLV_RP_DOWN_EI_THRESHOLD		70
-#define VLV_INT_COUNT_FOR_DOWN_EI		5
/* vlv2 north clock has */
  #define CCK_FUSE_REG				0x8
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index b37d634bea99..55dc406cd195 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3784,11 +3784,10 @@ static u32 gen6_rps_pm_mask(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
  	u32 mask = 0;
if (val > dev_priv->rps.min_freq_softlimit)
-		mask |= GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD | GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_TIMEOUT;
+		mask |= GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_EI_EXPIRED | GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD | GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_TIMEOUT;
  	if (val < dev_priv->rps.max_freq_softlimit)
-		mask |= GEN6_PM_RP_UP_THRESHOLD;
+		mask |= GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED | GEN6_PM_RP_UP_THRESHOLD;
- mask |= dev_priv->pm_rps_events & (GEN6_PM_RP_DOWN_EI_EXPIRED | GEN6_PM_RP_UP_EI_EXPIRED);
  	mask &= dev_priv->pm_rps_events;
return gen6_sanitize_rps_pm_mask(dev_priv, ~mask);

Patch looks fine
Reviewed-by: Deepak S<deepak.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux