On ti, 2015-03-17 at 11:35 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 3d4a7c3..d5dd0b3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -96,7 +96,18 @@ static void skl_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> > static void bxt_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
> > {
> > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > +
> > gen9_init_clock_gating(dev);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * FIXME:
> > + * GEN8_SDEUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE applies on A0 only.
>
> We have pci revid macros now. Do you have plans to roll similar ones out
> for bxt?
Yes. It may be that for BXT we also need to look at the PCI_REVISION_ID
field besides PCI_CLASS_REVISION, I still have to figure out the exact
mapping. (And also understand the meaning/difference between SOC vs. GT
revision IDs).
--Imre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
