On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 09:59 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 06:19:19PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > This will allow manual tests when crc isn't available. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > > index 0a56705..5085fb3 100644 > > --- a/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > > +++ b/tests/kms_psr_sink_crc.c > > @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void scratch_buf_init(struct igt_buf *buf, drm_intel_bo *bo) > > buf->bo = bo; > > buf->stride = 4096; > > buf->tiling = I915_TILING_X; > > - buf->size = 4096; > > + buf->size = 4; > > 4 looks a bit small ... agree, but as far as I can remember with 4 I can have visible changes and with 4096 I couldn't see any thing on screen even with psr disabled. > -Daniel > > > } > > > > static void fill_render(data_t *data, uint32_t handle, unsigned char color) > > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static void fill_render(data_t *data, uint32_t handle, unsigned char color) > > igt_assert(batch); > > > > rendercopy(batch, NULL, > > - &src_buf, 0, 0, 1, 1, > > + &src_buf, 0, 0, 0xff, 0xff, > > &dst_buf, 0, 0); > > > > intel_batchbuffer_free(batch); > > -- > > 1.9.3 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Intel-gfx mailing list > > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
