Re: [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Hide the source vs. sink rate handling from intel_dp_compute_config()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thursday 12 March 2015 08:40 PM, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

intel_dp_compute_config() only really needs to know the rates supported
by both source and sink, so hide the raw source and sink arrays from it.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 61538f4..a88f932 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -1192,9 +1192,9 @@ intel_dp_set_clock(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
  	}
  }
-static int intel_supported_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
-				 const int *sink_rates, int sink_len,
-				 int *supported_rates)
+static int intersect_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
+			   const int *sink_rates, int sink_len,
+			   int *supported_rates)
  {
  	int i = 0, j = 0, k = 0;
@@ -1213,6 +1213,21 @@ static int intel_supported_rates(const int *source_rates, int source_len,
  	return k;
  }
+static int intel_supported_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
+				 int *supported_rates)
+{
+	struct drm_device *dev = intel_dp_to_dev(intel_dp);
+	const int *source_rates, *sink_rates;
+	int source_len, sink_len;
+
+	sink_len = intel_dp_sink_rates(intel_dp, &sink_rates);
+	source_len = intel_dp_source_rates(dev, &source_rates);
+
+	return intersect_rates(source_rates, source_len,
+			       sink_rates, sink_len,
+			       supported_rates);
+}
+
Now when I am looking at it, the name "supported_rates", sounds confusing. Because first we are using it for sink_rates in intel_dp->supported_rates and then we use it to store the intersect_rates. Since sink_rates are termed supported_rates in the spec, can we remove the sink_rates altogether and have source_rates, sink_supported_rates and common_rates (or something else ?)

-Sonika
  static int rate_to_index(int find, const int *rates)
  {
  	int i = 0;
@@ -1243,17 +1258,10 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
  	int max_clock;
  	int bpp, mode_rate;
  	int link_avail, link_clock;
-	const int *sink_rates;
-	int supported_rates[8] = {0};
-	const int *source_rates;
-	int source_len, sink_len, supported_len;
-
-	sink_len = intel_dp_sink_rates(intel_dp, &sink_rates);
-
-	source_len = intel_dp_source_rates(dev, &source_rates);
+	int supported_rates[DP_MAX_SUPPORTED_RATES] = {};
+	int supported_len;
- supported_len = intel_supported_rates(source_rates, source_len,
-				sink_rates, sink_len, supported_rates);
+	supported_len = intel_supported_rates(intel_dp, supported_rates);
/* No common link rates between source and sink */
  	WARN_ON(supported_len <= 0);
@@ -1352,7 +1360,8 @@ found:
if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 9 && intel_dp->supported_rates[0]) {
  		intel_dp->rate_select =
-			rate_to_index(supported_rates[clock], sink_rates);
+			rate_to_index(supported_rates[clock],
+				      intel_dp->supported_rates);
  		intel_dp->link_bw = 0;
  	}

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux