On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 08:37:30AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 04:41:02PM -0700, jeff.mcgee@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> > From: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@xxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > tests/core_getparams needs the new libdrm interfaces for >> > querying subslice and EU counts. >> > >> > For: VIZ-4636 >> > Signed-off-by: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@xxxxxxxxx> >> > --- >> > configure.ac | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> > index 16d6a2e..88a1c3d 100644 >> > --- a/configure.ac >> > +++ b/configure.ac >> > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ if test "x$GCC" = "xyes"; then >> > fi >> > AC_SUBST(ASSEMBLER_WARN_CFLAGS) >> > >> > -PKG_CHECK_MODULES(DRM, [libdrm_intel >= 2.4.52 libdrm]) >> > +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(DRM, [libdrm_intel >= 2.4.60 libdrm]) >> >> Please don't and instead copypaste the new structs/defines with a local_ >> prefix like we do it for all the other new igt testcases. Forcing libdrm >> to get updated for igt all the time can get annoying fast. >> -Daniel >> > In this case I'm trying to exercise new API functions in libdrm which > wrap the GETPARAM ioctl. Would you rather me bypass the wrapper to > avoid requiring updated libdrm? I can do that, but it fails to test the > complete path that client would use. Am I missing something, or does 2.4.60 not exist yet? That said dependency bumps for igt seem like less of an issue than dependency bumps for mesa.. I mean if you are using igt you are probably on the latest anyways.. I'm not sure why Daniel is so concerned about that.. (but dependency bumps to something that doesn't exist yet should perhaps be avoided) BR, -R > -Jeff > >> > PKG_CHECK_MODULES(PCIACCESS, [pciaccess >= 0.10]) >> > PKG_CHECK_MODULES(OVERLAY_XVLIB, [xv x11 xext dri2proto >= 2.6], enable_overlay_xvlib=yes, enable_overlay_xvlib=no) >> > PKG_CHECK_MODULES(OVERLAY_XLIB, [cairo-xlib dri2proto >= 2.6], enable_overlay_xlib=yes, enable_overlay_xlib=no) >> > -- >> > 2.3.0 >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Intel-gfx mailing list >> > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >> >> -- >> Daniel Vetter >> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation >> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch >> _______________________________________________ >> Beignet mailing list >> Beignet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
